Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Orealla tagged as huge booster for agriculture

Guyana Chronicle article, 02 October 2007

http://www.guyanachronicle.com/news.html
Orealla tagged as huge booster for agriculture
By Clifford Stanley

ASSESSING POTENTIAL: Agriculture Minister Robert Persaud, right, with
farmers and officials in Orealla yesterday at the launch of Agriculture
Month 2007. (Photo, courtesy Government Information Agency)

AGRICULTURE Minister Mr. Robert Persaud yesterday launched Agriculture Month
observances from the logging community of Orealla on the Corentyne River in
keeping with the theme: "The right to food from a forestry perspective".
Agriculture Month this year is being observed under the theme: "The right to
food - a reality in Guyana" but the sub-theme "The right to food from a
forestry perspective", was specially chosen for the launch at Orealla as
part of this year's focus on hinterland agriculture and supplementary
activities.
The launch was preceded by field demonstrations staged by the Guyana
Forestry Commission (GFC) on aspects of logging, including directional
felling of a log, the use of the log tracking systems and the conversion of
a felled log into lumber using a chain saw.
A visiting team comprising senior officials in the various agricultural
agencies, regional officials of Region Six (East Berbice/Corentyne) and the
head of the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA)
were also taken to farm sites at Orealla, including a pineapple farm, before
the formal programme got under way at noon yesterday.
Persaud told the villagers his ministry had decided to launch Agriculture
Month from that location because of the perceived tremendous potential of
the area for both agricultural production and logging.
He stressed the importance of agriculture, food security and
self-sufficiency in the context of globalisation and said his intention was
to bring them up to date with plans for agriculture in Guyana and to
encourage them to support the plan by taking their productive activities to
a higher level. He assured them of continuous support from the government in
this regard.
The support, he said, would take the form of technology transfer activities
and training and in some instances assistance with equipment which could
make the area more productive.
Many of the officials at yesterday's launch, he said, would be returning to
the area soon to provide them with technological advice and assistance.
These include the National Agricultural Research Centre (NARI) whose
officers would assist with soil tests and other such supportive activities
in the community from time to time.
Commissioner of the Guyana Forestry Commission, Mr. James Singh, praised the
villagers for the cooperation and support for the GFC's mandate with respect
to the forestry resources in Orealla and the neighbouring village of
Siparuta.
Mr. Ignatius Jean of the IICA said he was captivated by the ambience of the
village and urged the residents to make efforts to encourage agro-tourism in
their community.
The visitors were welcomed by Captain of the village, Mr. Lean Devair, and
other speakers included Regional Chairman of Region Six, Mr. Zulfikar
Mustapha and Mr. John Woolford, the Hinterland Coordinator of the Ministry
of Agriculture.
Officials who attended and participated in the launch included Mr. Brian
Greenidge, Deputy Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture, Dr.
Oudho Homenauth of NARI, Mr. Nezam Hussain of the Guyana Marketing
Corporation (GMC) among others.
ENDS

The Freedom of Information Bill should be a priority

http://www.stabroeknews.com/index.pl/article?id=56530156

Dear Editor,

With all of the scams that are being exposed under this present government, including the forestry/timber scam, there is a more urgent need now for support for the Trotman/AFC Freedom of Information Bill. Time after time events show that this bill needs to be a priority for parliament. Refusal to examine this bill shows that you are not in support of transparency.

Yours faithfully,

Christopher Vieira

Govt.'s neglect of Science not consistent with its public statements at the recent "Historic" Bio-Conference

Govt.'s neglect of Science not consistent with its public statements at the
recent "Historic" Bio-Conference
Kaieteur News
Monday 10-01-2007

Dear Editor,

We have been saying for a long time that His Excellency, President Bharrat
Jagdeo, and his ruling elite do not understand science and its absolute
necessity for the economic development of Guyana and its resources.

Their non-comprehensions of the value of practical science (as opposed to
the propaganda of claiming to be supporting and or doing science) gets worse
as evidenced by the continued underdevelopment of our resources, the poverty
of our people, and the fact that they have no sound plans - since they do
not listen to the expert technical advice and suggestions of non-PPP party
personnel.

Several people (including myself) have been writing about the necessity for
the proper funding of science and technology, and research and development
in Guyana . We simply cannot meet current needs and are not preparing to
meet the future needs of Guyana .

His Excellency, President B. Jagdeo knows that there is no serious science
being done in Guyana . He knows that no significant scientific (pure and
applied) research is being done at UG. His Government has never budgeted for
this over the years.

The President as the ex-Finance Minister knows that nothing was and is being
done to lay a proper foundation for the development of our own scientists.
The President should therefore realise that anything he says (at this
"Historic" Bio-conference) would not be consistent with his past government
policies.

We read the following: "In a statement issued by President Bharrat Jagdeo,
delivered by the Prime Minster Samuel Hinds, it was noted that understanding
the status of biological sciences is most necessary for conservation and
sustainable utilisation of the region's rich biological diversity.

"In the statement, the President appeals to the scientific community and all
disciplines in the University of Guyana to take full advantage of the
historic international conference and to develop strong links with visiting
participants and their institutions." (See: Historic Bio Conference
commences - Guyanese urged to take full advantage, KN 25th Sept., 2007).

I am not sure what makes this conference "historic". There have been other
conferences in Guyana - maybe the organisers can enlighten us as to its
historical significance. Hearing that we have great potential is nothing
new, every Guyanese know this. That is an old song. (I have been hearing
this since my primary school days.)

One of the perks of a visiting scientist is traveling to distant places to
attend conferences with your airfare and hotel accommodation being paid. A
poster is presented and/or a talk is given. It is a good getaway from the
serious research, especially to an 'exotic' tropical place few know about.

It is a great conversation/slide show for the visiting conference attendees
on their return to their own research/work setting. Hopefully, they also
might contemplate on what they have seen and heard - in this case the
unbelievable gross neglect of science despite all the government's talk, the
rundown University with no teaching and research facilities, the solicited
obligation to help, and the shock of so much poverty in the midst of so much
beauty and plentiful resources, etc.

We are further told: "The conference stands as an arena to highlight ongoing
biological science research within the regions.

It aims to share and disseminate information on knowledge and scientific
research related to Biology in the Caribbean and around the world.

It will also provide participants with opportunities for collaboration and
networking among Universities and other scientific institutions for
promoting research and developing technologies." (KN, 24th Sept., 2007).

I would add that that since no meaningful and innovative research is being
done at UG, and no new funding has been announced, the status quo (absence
of: labs, facilities, and infrastructure) will remain the same.

So how can UG "highlight ongoing biological science," or "share and
disseminate information on knowledge and scientific research?"

Therefore, I also cannot see how any meaningful "opportunities for
collaboration and networking" can be set up. For example, the Biology labs
are in a state of disrepair. There was a hole in the floor, windows cannot
close or open, and the plumbing and electrification were defective (fire
hazards), despite the EU grant/loan to repair the labs.

No one was ever charged for misappropriation of these funds. How can any
government permit misappropriation of funds for education? We must ask why
this is allowed to happen.

When I came to UG, I had planned to set up collaborations with various
reputable scientists. The people I spoke with were willing to play their
part in areas of expertise that I lack or could not do locally.

However, as stated before, I could not do any basic research (no: research
labs, equipment, and infrastructure, funding, etc).

From my knowledge and experience, in any scientific collaboration, one has
to do some serious work; and only research work outside one's own field or
expertise is sent to a collaborator.

Most collaborators would not want to do all the scientific work and put the
name of a person who does not have the capacity to contribute to the
research work on the publication - that contribution has to be earned by
scientific work.

During my tenure at the University of Guyana , all that I possibly do is
essentially to collect and ship samples overseas; and even this would be
prohibited by the bureaucracy and red tape of the EPA.

As stated before no one gets his/her name on a publication without serious
scientific input, and the most that one will get is an acknowledgement in a
footnote - for providing samples! My ordeal at UG was magnified with the
prospect of being only someone else's 'mere sample collector.' That is
definitely not science. In addition, no Guyanese is being trained, and
Guyanese are unlikely to benefit.

Science is a tough business and collaboration has to be done with peers on
an equal footing - from a position of strength. Most of the work has to be
done in Guyana by Guyanese scientists.

Our people have to look out for our own interests or else it will be like
forestry - the Asian companies get the lumber and we get plundered; or, like
mining - the mining companies get the gold and we get the holes and mercury
spills.

The people (however well-intentioned) who are talking and advocating of
doing collaborative work have probably never had the international
experience of being in the frontlines of serious and meaningful science in
world class labs.

The locals who participate will be reduced to the role as sample collectors
because the University of Guyana lacks facilities on all fronts. It is
probably this basic understanding that the President, his ruling elite, and
his 'scientific advisors' do not comprehend, hence his further
counter-productive government policies, which unfortunately have serious
negative effects on development and on the University and Guyana.

Hence this conference is most likely another attempt to deceive the Guyanese
people that the government is seriously doing something to promote science
and scientific research.

It is time that His Excellency, President B Jagdeo and his ruling elite do
the right thing for Guyana . It is hard for the President and the PPP to
escape the judgment of the People and of History.

Seelochan Beharry PhD



Guyana contributes negligibly to greenhouse emissions
Guyana Chronicle
September 28, 2007

It was good to see Guyana's lobbying efforts for standing forests reaching
the international arena and our Head of State Bharrat Jagdeo again taking
the lead in this regard.

I noticed in the press the President joining the dialogue with the United
Nations Secretary General for support at the political level for action to
address climate change. This is a positive step towards our development.

Guyana came face-to-face with the effects of climate change after the flood
of 2005 which resulted in significant loss to the country's GDP and the need
for adequate adaptation was clearly defined.

The President however, made the correct point that Guyana has a negligible
contribution to greenhouse gases and our forest resources are intact, which
is a critical asset to climate change mitigation.

I hope our President's lobby is fulfilled. Let's all lend our support for a
better Guyana.
Hackett

Barama not denying miners access to new roads

Barama ?not denying miners access to new roads'
Kaieteur news, 29 September 2007

Barama, one of Guyana 's largest logging companies, is denying that it will be
totally stopping persons from using roads and trails it has built in the
interior.

Miners, last week, said that the company will be denying access to miners to new
roads and trails being built by them.

Barama's Chairman, Girwar Lalaram, on Thursday, said that the company ?is
concerned over recent reports in the press regarding the use of company roads
by the mining community.?

According to Barama, it is merely seeking to have proper mechanisms in place to
monitor mining activities within the certified areas, with ?special emphasis
on proper environmental practices and strict safety precautions in using the
roads.?

At a press conference held last Saturday, miners also claimed that no further
mining licences will be issued for concessions in the Barama-held area. While
Barama did not address this issue Thursday, it said that a full statement will
be issued shortly.

The Guyana Gold and Diamond Miners Association (GGDMA) is also claiming that
several new decisions by the government to regulate the mining industry will,
instead, have adverse effects. The decisions were conveyed to the miners during
a meeting with Prime Minister Sam Hinds last week, the Association said.

According to the miners, the decisions will, in effect, force the closure of
small and medium scale mining operations within six months if they are
implemented.

GGDMA also disclosed that the decision by regulatory body, the Guyana Geology
and Mines Commission (GGMC), to increase rental payments for land concessions
has been done without the input of the Association.

The Association said that it was taken aback, too, by the decision to stop all
dredging operations in the Waini area since it was ?surprised that such
decisions can be taken without any consultation with the mining community.?

GGDMA had also lashed out at a mining committee that was being set up by
Government without the miners' input.

According to GGDMA, the committee has not yet spoken to the miners. (Leonard
Gildarie)

Amerindian/Forestry Act undermines mining legislation - GGDMA

Amerindian/Forestry Act undermines
mining legislation - GGDMA
Kaieteur news, 29 september 2007

Following the recent decision by Government as it relates the mining sector,
yesterday, the Guyana Gold and Diamond Miners Association (GGDMA) met with the
affected miners to formally notify them.

According to GGDMA Executive Director, Edward Shields, the entity was ambushed
by the decision and with no formal notification of the verdict.

One of the issues that seemed to have affected the miners most was the fact
that, ?Sections (two pages) of the Amerindian Act have thrown out the mining
legislation and regulation,? said Shields.

The Forestry Act was also cited as a piece of legislation that appeared to be
hampering the sovereignty of the Mining Act.

He also recounted incidents that saw notification to vacate being issued to
miners by Amerindian villages, a scenario that Shields condemned stating that
the GGDMA was the only body that could issue cease orders to miners.

He said that the miners had requested a meeting with Amerindian Affairs
Minister, Carolyn Rodrigues, to have the concern resolved. This meeting would
be convened in the coming month.

Former head of the GGDMA, Edward Hopkinson, declared to the miners present that
Amerindians had no right to the gold and diamonds given that they did not own
it, that it belongs to the state.

Another issue raised as a hindrance to the mining sector was the fact that a new
regulation has been drafted without any consultations, a move that the GGDMA has
been attempting to bar but according to Shields given the recent revelations
that might be in vain.

Carbon credits were also identified as a hindrance to the sector given that for
the scheme to work trees have to remain standing.

?Sometimes we have to cut trees to mine,? said Shields.

The emergency meeting was called prior to the bi-monthly meeting given the
recent announcements that the administration had adopted several measures that
may see the disappearance of small and medium scale mining.

The export of logs should be banned

http://www.stabroeknews.com/index.pl/article?id=56530098

Stabroek News

Dear Editor,

I am very happy to see that you have given space to Ms Bulkan to highlight the practices of Barama. I would like to also add to the list Mr Seelochan Beharry. I think all Guyana should applaud these people for their efforts to educate us on the unfair and destructive practices of this company in our forestry sector.

I am amazed that the government is still considering what options to take when it is clear to us that we as a nation are being 'taken for a ride.'

Perhaps we are waiting for some international consultant to come and prepare a report for us, hold a big consultation at the Le Meridien, tell us what we already know, then we will wake up and think of taking a stand.

It is about time that we exert more pressure on the government to end the export of prime and other species of logs not only by Barama, but in general.

The industry is always crying out about the need for value-added operations, but if drastic measures are not taken now, then value added will never happen.

I think the international donor agencies should also get involved and make debt relief conditional upon proper forestry practices; after all they too have a stake in the 'lungs of the world.'

Barama tells us all the time that the operations are not profitable; I would like to know which business entity would continue to operate over the longer term when their operations were not economically viable?

I think we have had enough excuses and it's about time we take a firm stand. Ban all exports of logs immediately.

Yours faithfully,

Vincent Ferreira

Bajan wood importer urges export guarantee scheme

Barbadian investors are upbeat about Guyana, saying that the market has been good to them but one potential investor is calling on government to establish an export guarantee scheme especially for natural resources.

A team of 40 was here for an investment seminar held on the eve of the opening of GuyExpo and while many of them have returned home, some have remained to capture any opportunities which the exhibition could open for them.

Job Clarke, Managing Director of Winfred Trophies, a Barbadian firm which imports greenheart from Guyana is passionate about continuing his trade which he says is financially feasible but his suppliers have raised many concerns with him.

Clarke is hoping to find a direct contact, an individual or organisation, which could oversee the quality of wood he receives.

Clarke has had many bad experiences with local suppliers who, he said, have been less than honourable. He believes too that some local suppliers tend to be very short-term in their thinking.

"Many times we order a container of greenheart and the quality is not good enough, but I believe it is a case of them cutting the trees too early so by the time it gets to Barbados it is not always of good quality," he said.

Export guarantee scheme

It is in this regard that he suggested the setting up of an export guarantee scheme which could help all importers, not just Barbadians, to be able to reclaim their monies as long as they are not satisfied with the quality of merchandise received.

With more than 17 years experience in the wood import business, Clarke said that Bajans were biased when it comes to wood and so always prefer Guyanese greenheart to any other, but they were concerned with reliability of production as well. The quality of wood received sometimes, he conceded, gave the impression that much was not being done at the local end by the regulating authority to ensure that all wood exported was of a certain quality. "They probably do not always put their stamp of approval," he said.

"The same type of protection you demonstrate locally, you must protect the exporters since one unscrupulous exporter could spoil it for others," he said.

Clarke noted too that many hoteliers in Barbados are interested in using greenheart to construct their buildings and so Guyana was definitely assured of a market for its most popular hardwood.

"The opportunities are here and we don't know what the future holds unless we deal with the present and we could look back at the best things we have done and just do it again," he recommended.

Stabroek News also caught up with export manager of PineHill Dairy, Levear Bannister. Pinehill, a beverage company based in Barbados, entered the local market through its affiliate Banks DIH from where the beverages are distributed.

"The market has generally been good to us, the Guyanese market has great potential," Bannister said.

However, he said that there was need for a faster turnaround time, from the time the container arrives in Guyana to the time it would actually reach the distributor.

He said the feedback received was that the customs and trade system was a bit slow. Pinehill products are available in all the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), Guyana, Trinidad and Belize and the export manager has said that the St. Lucian market may be the best across the region while in Trinidad and Guyana, the market share was growing on an annual basis.

The West Indian Biscuit Company (WIBISCO), which has distribution agents across the Caribbean, the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, is the producer of the famous Shirley Biscuit and many other biscuits found on supermarket shelves and shops. WIBISCO has recorded favourable responses.

This has caused the company to now launch a Barbadian favourite, Tea Time, in the local market. Brand Manager Jeanie Bynoe, speaking with this newspaper from the company's booth at GuyExpo, also mentioned the hold-up at customs, noting that this was an occasional challenge not unique to Guyana.

Eezee Cricket, a trivia game which is a combination of snakes and ladders and trivia will also now be available at local bookstores in a short while.

Barbadian Hayden Coppin has brought the game which according to him has already caught the eye of a bookstore owner.

The game consists of 300 West Indies cricket questions, a board resembling that of the popular Caribbean game, snakes and ladder and participants answer cricket questions and score points for themselves for every correctly answered question.

The game is popular in Trinidad, Jamaica, Grenada and St. Lucia and once Coppin is able to find a local distributor, Eezee Cricket could well be on the way to becoming a Guyanese favourite.

The response is already great and several of the games have been sold.

These investors are but a few from Barbados who are impressed with the local market and hope to establish links with local distributors as the theme for this year's event encourages.

GuyExpo this year is being held under the theme "Partnering for Progress".