Monday, April 28, 2008

Surama chosen to film Riocochet's TV series "unbreakable"

Surama chosen to film Riocochet's TV series "unbreakable"
Guyana Chronicle, 27 April 2008
http://www.guyanachronicle.com/news.html

THE indigenous tourism community, Surama has been chosen by Ricochet,
Britain's leading independent television company as one of the
locations for the filming of an adventure reality based survivor type
contest and TV series titled "Unbreakable" said the Guyana Tourism
Authority (GTA).

According to a release, the 20 member team comprising of 12 film crew
and eight contestants arrived in Guyana on Saturday and the production
shoot will begin next Tuesday.

The press statement explained that the contest is about survival in
the great outdoors and wilderness and contestants will undergo a
series of grueling tasks to test their survival skills and endurance.

"The contestants, both male and female will have to endure a series of
challenges from wrestling with anacondas, biting off the heads of live
piranhas to ensuring the traditional Makushi stick beating ritual,"
the release disclosed.

The series will also be filmed in Africa and Europe.

It noted: "This adventure docu-series will provide destination Guyana
with much needed positive publicity and will help to create more
awareness of and raise the profile and image of unspoilt, untouched
and undiscovered Guyana. The series will also help to promote, brand
and share with the world our indigenous Makushi culture and tradition,
our eco tourism product, community based tourism, the remote village
of Surama, our flora and fauna, wildlife, etc".

The indigenous community will benefit from the construction of three
thatched bush camps, two toilets, two dug out canoes, two aluminum
boats with engines, a generator, a laptop computer among other
equipment, the statement underlined.

In addition, it said, over 20 persons from the village will be
employed and community members will be prominently featured during the
five day shoot.

Previous big screen motion pictures that were filmed here include
White Diamond, Guiana 1838, BBC's Extreme Dream and a National
Geographic documentary on the otters, scaling Mount Roraima.

UK gives $2M for new butterfly industry

UK gives $2M for new butterfly industry
Kaieteur News, 3 April 2008
http://www.kaieteurnewsgy.com/news.html

Little is known of the production of tropical butterflies for the
export market but that may soon change. The British High Commission
yesterday presented a cheque for just over $2 million to Iwokrama to
support the development of the industry at Fair View village in the
Iwokrama Forest.
The money will be used to purchase UV resistant panels for the roof of
a butterfly house that is being built for the production of
butterflies. A team of experts from the UK is in Guyana to lend
support to the project and Iwokrama has received expressions of
interest from greenhouses in the USA and the UK which are willing to
purchase the butterflies. The butterflies will be bred and exported
when they reach the pupa stage.
Butterfly production is seen as a growing business especially for
tropical countries and Guyana could likely join a list of countries,
including neighbouring Suriname, which are already benefiting from
this market. Training for the production of a butterfly guide,
identifying caterpillar diseases, butterfly identification and
taxonomy have already been carried out and there are plans to build a
packing room where the pupas will be packed for shipping and a
visitors centre. These plans will enhance Guyana's growing ecotourism
industry.
The project is part of the Darwin Initiative programme through which
the UK assists countries to reach their obligations to the
International Convention on Biological Diversity by helping them to
achieve the conservation of biological diversity; the sustainable use
of its components; and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits.
To date the programme has supported six projects in Guyana

Logger arrested, deported after traveling along Corentyne River

Logger arrested, deported after traveling along Corentyne River
Kaieteur News, 10 April 2008

By Melissa Johnson
CORRIVERTON, CORENTYNE - A Guyanese logger was reportedly arrested
and deported by the Surinamese authorities for not being in possession
of a valid travel document as he traveled along the Corentyne River.
This act has sparked anger among some sections of the Corentyne.
Businessman Ganesh Singh owns two logging concessions, one at Cow
Falls some 139 miles up the Corentyne River, and the other at Wanatabo
some 200 miles further along.
On his return to Guyana, the man related that on Friday morning he
took three forestry officers up to the Wanatabo Forest Resource to
undertake verification in order to commence operation of his logging
concession.
"This concession has now been transformed into a timber sale
agreement. So the procedure is that you have to have the forestry
officer verify it before you can start working."
It was while they were returning home the following day that the
incident took place. "Me and my manager, Outram Prasad, left Wanatabo
to travel to Cow Falls. On my way I stopped to fish with my rod within
the Cow Falls concession area that is at Matawai (in the vicinity of
Wanatabo).
"While fishing, the Suriname police approached me with their boat -
about eight policemen with guns. They asked me for my passport. I said
to them I have no passport with me because I have been traveling for
the past 35 years to the same concession without having to use a
passport.
They said to me that I am on Suriname water and as such I am illegal
and they would have me arrested and taken to Suriname.
They took me to the pontoon that they were pushing. It was some
pontoon they had seized from some Surinamese."
He recalled that when he got on the vessel he saw five of his workers
on the said pontoon along with the boat they were using to travel to
another location in the vicinity of the Iguana Island area.
The businessman said that later the said Monday evening the forestry
officers were on their way back from Wanatabo and they stopped upon
seeing him.
"I had their belongings on my boat like their material and clothing.
When they stopped alongside me they were ordered to go on the pontoon
and the Suriname police asked them to produce their passports.
They told them it was their first trip up the Corentyne River and that
they were not told by their superiors that they had to have travel
documents to travel on the Corentyne River."
According to him, the officers produced their identification badges
and were allow to go free.
"That was my only way of sending a message out for my people to know
what happened to me. They kept me on board the pontoon Monday night
with the other workers.
The pontoon happened to be grounded on a rock so they couldn't go
further so they had no other alternative than to leave the pontoon
behind the next day (Tuesday).
Two Suriname police officers went with my boat and my Manager and me
to Aporea Police Station in West Suriname."
The businessman and his workers were later placed in the lock-ups at
Nickerie. "My workers complained to me that they were badly beaten.
This morning (Wednesday) about 10:00h they sent us to South Drain and
the seven of us were deported using the Canawaima to Guyana about
11:00 hours."
Back home, the immigration authorities handed them over to the
Springlands Police Station where statements were taken.
Ganesh Singh feels the matter should be looked into by those in
authority. "I would have to take this matter to the Foreign Affairs
Ministry in Guyana. What the Surinamese police are saying is that
anybody they find in the Suriname territory on the river without their
passport stamped they would hold them as illegal."
President of the Upper Corentyne Chamber of Commerce, David Subnauth,
condemned the action. "This is nonsense! Guyanese have been using the
Corentyne River from the beginning of time to do their business and to
go to their lands on the Corentyne River.
We use the river to bring down sand, logs, agricultural produce and to
go up to this resort and to Orealla, Siparuta and further up. We were
never harassed."
He said this incident with the logger is the beginning of a difficult
situation. "Unless this is immediately tackled by our Foreign Affairs
people it might escalate to a situation where we Guyanese cannot use
the river. This would pose tremendous difficulties for many of us."
For those living along the river he asked, "Do they have to get a
passport too?"
Incidentally, Wanatabo was the location where the Joint Services
destroyed an illegal airstrip and found an aircraft.

Guyanese logger held by Suriname

Guyanese logger held by Suriname
Stabroek News, April 11, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1116#more-1116
A Crabwood Creek logger at Ganesh Singh & Brothers Logging/Contours
has said that Suriname police seized his boat and engine after
detaining him along with his manager and five workers and then
deporting them for being "illegal in Suriname waters."
Ganesh Singh told this newspaper that he had done an inventory in an
area along the Corentyne River and on Friday three forestry officers
accompanied him and the workers to conduct a verification exercise.
He said the Suriname police were towing a pontoon that was apparently
used for dredging, back to Suriname when they made the arrest. He and
his workers were detained and later deported to Guyana via the Molsen
Creek ferry.
According to him, on Monday he sent the forestry officers to the
Wonotobo Resort while he proceeded to Cow Falls to wait on them to
travel back home the following morning.
Singh said in the meantime he stopped at Matawai to do fishing with
rods and while there the Suriname police approached him and requested
that he produce his passport.
He said his workers had already been held up along with two chainsaws,
a 75 HP Yamaha outboard engine and a quantity of grocery and they
later said that the police had beaten them badly.
The logger told Stabroek News that he found it strange that he was
asked to produce his passport since he had been travelling in the
Corentyne River for over 35 years and he was never asked to do so
before. Singh said while the forestry officers were on their way to
meet him at Cow Falls they saw his boat on the pontoon and stopped
since some of their belongings were in his boat. But the Suriname
police threatened to arrest them as well if they could not produce
their passports. It was only after Singh explained to the police that
the men were forestry officers and had never been in the Corentyne
River before that they were allowed to go. The forestry officers then
reported the plight to Singh's family.
He pointed out that on Tuesday morning the pontoon was grounded on a
rock and the police asked him to go with his boat to a police outpost
at Aporea, West Suriname. The logger said they remained there for the
day then the police later took them to Sokoe's Sawmill. He said the
police ranks removed his engine and transported it in the police van
to the police station. He could not say what they had done to his
boat.
After he arrived in Guyana yesterday he made a report to the ranks at
the Springlands Police Station. He reiterated that he and his workers
were wrongfully held as the only way to access his logging concession
was through the Corentyne River.
He plans to "take up" the matter with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and questioned whether the residents travelling from Orealla would
also have to produce passports.

The Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill is still languishing in the National Assembly two years after it was first tabled as a private member's bill

The Freedom of Information (FOI) Bill is still languishing in the
National Assembly two years after it was first tabled as a private
member's bill by then PNCR MP Raphael Trotman.
Stabroek News, April 11, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1112#more-1112

A closure plan for the Omai mines has been agreed to by the relevant
parties and the existing infrastructure is to be left at the location
rather than the site being restored to its natural state.
This disclosure yesterday, was to have been made at a press briefing
but the absence of Prime Minister Samuel Hinds forced the cancelling
of the event. However, the Guyana Information Agency (GINA) issued a
joint statement from the Government, the Guyana Geology and Mines
Commission (GGMC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Omai
Gold Mines Limited (OGML)/IAMGOLD regarding the agreement.
The statement said that at the request of the Government, the closure
plan for the site was changed from the originally contemplated 'back
to nature' model to an 'after use' one. It explained that as a result,
infrastructure will be retained at the site including internal
roadways, landings, barge, airport/ airstrip and access road, power
plant distribution, camp site and mill site facilities including the
gyratory crusher and the aggregate plant.
It disclosed that Hinds stated that consistent with pursuing the
'after use' options for the Omai site, Guyana is inviting other mining
companies to re-evaluate the underground mining possibilities at that
location.
Production at the mine had ceased in 2005 and the parties have agreed
to the conditions of the Closure Plan conducted by OGML and which
covered site reclamation, re-vegetation and physical, biological and
chemical stability and which up to this point has been monitored by
the EPA and the GGMC. The statement said that the company reported
that it has spent some US$6M since production ceased.
According to the statement, the closure plan envisages the completion
of all environmental and other activities at the Omai Mine site by the
company by the end of September. OGML has given the required notice of
its intent to terminate the Mineral Agreement and voluntarily
relinquish its mining licence with effect from October this year; the
statement said adding that at the hand-over of the property, slated
for October 1, a full and complete certificate of compliance will be
issued.
The statement noted that the company is pursuing "one …prospect of
Eagle Mountain about 75km away and has been reviewing other prospects
in Guyana".
It added that the EPA confirms that generally OGML has complied with
the identified limits and other environmental requirements of the
Agency and the company's compliance was consistent with its ISO 14001
certification for environmental management.
Meanwhile, the GGMC acknowledged "the pioneering nature of the
operations of OGML and notes that the mining regulations and the
historic Mineral Agreement which this development engendered provided
a strong framework for the financing and operation of a world-class
large gold mining operation in conformity with prevailing
international standards".
Hinds, according to the statement, indicated that the collaboration
between the government and Cambior, the parent company of OMGL is
"evidence of the welcome and partnership which the Government and the
people of Guyana extend to Foreign Direct Investment".
The statement said that OGML has stated that its operations at Omai
were a "roller coaster ride" with highs and lows, with particular low
points being the gold price plummeting to a low of US$252 per ounce
during its operation and the rupture of its tailings dam in 1995 which
saw the declaration of the Essequibo River as a disaster area. It
noted that the company considers its greatest success as being able to
produce approximately 3.8 million ounces of gold from its surface
mining operations before the ore body was exhausted in September 2005.
The site had been explored by Golden Star Resources Limited led by
David Fennell and culminated with Cambior Inc establishing OGML in
1991. The mine was opened on March 11, 1993 by the late President, Dr
Cheddi Jagan.

Not all the people in the hinterland are Amerindians

Not all the people in the hinterland are Amerindians
Stabroek News, April 11, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?cat=5&paged=2
Dear Editor,
Whenever there is some new development in the hinterland the headline
reads Amerindians now have access to whatever, whether it be water or
electricity.
The point I am trying to make is that if you look at the ethnic make
up of these regions you would see that the people are not 100%
Amerindians.
Whenever there is report on Buxton, for example, the headline never
reads "African Guyanese now have greater access to new development"
and in a report on Lusignan the headline never reads "East Indians
now have greater access to a health facility."
Yours faithfully,
S Khan

WWF Guianas embarking on major public awareness drive in Guyana

WWF Guianas embarking on major public awareness drive in Guyana
Guyana Chronicle, 13 April 2008
http://www.guyanachronicle.com/topstory.html#Anchor-Presiden-49177

Gold mining pollution abatement officer (standing) during an awareness
exercise with miners
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Guianas, a global Non-Governmental
Organisation (N GO) working in Guyana for almost 10 years, has planned
a major public awareness drive in Guyana to sensitise the masses of
the Guyanese people to its existence here, and its ongoing and
intensified collaboration with the government and people of Guyana.

The local office, previously located in Bel Air Park, is now housed at
285 Irving Street, Queenstown, and is one of three located in the
Region. The other two are in French Guiana and Suriname. The regional
WWF Guianas office is based in Suriname.

WWF Guianas was established here in 1999 after the Guianian Moist
Forests region covering the three Guianas was identified as one of 238
eco-regions with the highest priority areas for conservation world
wide.

Cognizant that many Guyanese are yet unaware of WWF and its mission
and many if they hear of the name would think of a certain wrestling
federation, WWF Guianas affirms that it is important to note that the
only official 'WWF' in Guyana is World Wildlife Fund!


WWF Freshwater officer (far left) with local fishermen taking part in
the Arapaima survey
Until recently, the task force in Guyana was very small, but has now
expanded to include a Forestry Officer, a Freshwater Officer, a Gold
Mining Pollution Abatement Officer and an Education and Communications
Officer.

Some recent highlights include:
* working with various forestry companies to achieve Forest
Stewardship Council (FSC) status;
* establishing wildlife clubs nationwide,

* robust establishment of working relationship with miners to reduce pollution;

* the carrying out an Arapaima survey in the Rupununi;

* working closely with other organisations in setting up the Kaieteur
National Park;

* as well as planning for the Kanuku Mountains protected area.

In addition, the Forestry Officer is working closely with various
communities to assist them in community forestry techniques so that
they can use their forests in a successful and a sustainable way.



WWF Forestry officer (right) working to assist a local forestry
company in implementing eco friendly logging practices
The WWF Office has also given grants to various educational
establishments to assist them in their environmental awareness
initiatives. The office hosted a panel discussion for World Water Day
on March 20th, and is currently in the process of working with the
National Library, promoting awareness and education.

Working in over 100 countries worldwide, WWF has more than 2000
conservation projects underway at any one time. The WWF Guianas
Programme is a WWF conservation initiative launched in 1998, covering
the three Guianas and targeting the Guianian Eco-region complex

The mission of WWF in brief is: ȁTo conserve habitats and protect
flora and fauna in order to ensure a healthy and working ecosystem
that also serves to support human populations."

Currently, WWF Guianas is working under the Guianas Sustainable
Natural Resources Management Project under which there are 6 main
programme areas: Sustainable Forest Management, the Gold Mining
Pollution Abatement, Protected Areas Establishment and Management,
Freshwater Conservation and Management, Species Conservation and
Management, and Environmental Education and Communication.

British High Commission supports Guyana's Birding Tourism

British High Commission supports Guyana's Birding Tourism
Guyana Chronicle, 13 April 2008.

THE Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation and
Development has received a US$8,000 boost from the British High
Commission and two 'Guides to Birds of Northern South America' books.

The Commission is assisting in sponsoring a training programme for
birding guides in recognition of the need and potential of Guyana's
tourism industry.

The programme will facilitate the training of 16 guides who will
undergo two weeks of intermediate level training at the Bina Hill
Institute, Surama Village, Region Nine, and at the Iwokrama Field
Station in Region Eight. In addition, three or five persons will be
trained as trainers, a British High Commission release stated.

The training programme is scheduled to start mid-May, and will be
conducted by two trainers from the United Kingdom and Peru.

Recently, the British High Commission launched a 'Best practices in
ecotourism' workshop to train and prepare tour operators and birding
guides, among others, in the tourism industry, to improve the
management of Guyana's tourism resources.

The workshop started on April 7-8 at the British High Commissioner's
Residence and continued at the Bina Hill Institute in Annai on April
9-10. The last workshop is planned for June 3-4 at Lethem.

The workshop is being sponsored by the Commission at a cost of 20,000
pounds sterling.

The Iwokrama centre manages one million acres of forest in central
Guyana. The centre's main objective is to show how tropical forests
can be conserved while being used to provide ecological, social and
economic benefits to local and international communities.

Features of Iwokrama include the only state-of-the-art canopy walkway
in the Guianas, bird-watching with over 500 species of birds, jungle
trekking through one of the nine designated trails, guided nature
walks, nocturnal wildlife spotting by vehicle, foot and boat, and the
Indian Island sunrise boat ride.

Another feature to come on stream soon will be a butterfly farm where
visitors can enjoy a guided tour, viewing at least 10 different
species. Visitors will also be able to learn the Amerindian technique
of using a bow and arrow. (GINA)

Earth Day symposium focuses on energy conservation

Earth Day symposium focuses on energy conservation
Stabroek News, April 23, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=2102#more-2102

The importance of energy conservation in the light of high oil prices
and an increased awareness of the realities of climate change were the
focus of a symposium organised by the University of Guyana (UG) on the
occasion of Earth Day, yesterday.
Science Advisor to the Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre Dr
Ulric Trotz told the audience that several technical issues still need
to be worked out to successfully address the quantification of carbon
discharged from the atmosphere through forests like Guyana's. He said
that this was important since carbon sequestration could be a means
for countries like Guyana to benefit economically. He said such
countries have to rally for local action and these efforts have to be
more than just foreign companies buying themselves clean through cheap
credits.
Trotz said that people may be able to change their farming systems to
make them friendlier to the environment. He also pointed out that
non-till methods, crop rotation and mulching could all help in
sequestering carbon. "Building in timber is another way in
sequestering carbon," he said. He explained too that prudent forest
management is a way of coping with climate change. Trotz said that
this puts Guyana's standing forests as a tremendous resource, which
can bring money into the country. He noted that the commoditisation of
carbon has provided a commercial impetus for people to start storing
carbon.
In her presentation, Dr Raquel Thomas, Director of Resource Management
at the Iwokrama International Centre, said standing forests must be
valued. She said forests cover 30 per cent of the earth's land surface
and that only five per cent of the world's tropical forests remain and
those house almost 50 per cent of the world's biodiversity. She noted
that Guyana's emissions are among the lowest in the world.
Thomas slammed the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol
which gives countries incentives to replant after they would have
destroyed their forests. "The CDM does not benefit countries like
Guyana… we do hope that within a year or 18 months, changes to the
Kyoto Protocol would lead to something that could benefit Guyana," she
said. Thomas also said "We cannot avoid looking at the links to
poverty alleviation… we have to focus on the economics. We are talking
about livelihoods," adding that standing forests are not treated with
sufficient urgency.
"The issue of standing forests is treated like a poor cousin in global
political and public debates on climate change," she said. "Standing
forests must be valued," Thomas said, adding that it must be more than
just a conservation value. "Eco-system services must become
commercially saleable."
Thomas said business and livelihood drive deforestation and so
relevant and real opportunities have to be found to alleviate poverty.
The director said too that there is a lack of sufficient information
for trading in relation to valuing eco-system services and sustainable
forest management.
Meanwhile, Professor Suresh Narine, Head of the Institute for Applied
Science and Technology, noted that although biofuel might be a
solution for the energy woes of Guyana, it might not work on a world
scale. He said that even if all the available lands were cultivated
for biofuel production, this might not be sufficient for all of the
world's energy demands. Narine said in Guyana agricultural land did
not have to be displaced for ethanol production since there was land
aplenty.
Others who made presentations at the symposium were acting CEO of the
Guyana Energy Agency Mahender Sharma, Senior Lecturer, SEES Dr Patrick
Williams, Commissioner, Guyana Lands and Surveys Commission Andrew
Bishop and Manager Guyana Shield Eco-Region Project, United Nations
Development Programme Dr Patrick Chesney.
The seminar was hosted by UG's School of Earth and Environmental
Sciences and held at Hotel Tower.

Corruption at Customs is nothing new, it never seems to change

Corruption at Customs is nothing new, it never seems to change
Stabroek News, letters. April 18, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1617#more-1617

Dear Editor,
I have noted the recent corruption probe at Customs House, and I am
quite surprised at the news it is generating. Everyone in Guyana is
aware that there is corruption at the GRA. This is no surprise or
ground shattering revelation, in fact I am quite surprised that the
media is actually bothering to report on it.
A cursory glance at the assets acquired by these public servants, the
vehicles they drive, their lifestyles would have told any idiot with
an IQ of -2.6, that exact tale. But the Management, which should bear
full responsibility, time and time again, choose always to ignore. The
usual mantra taken out of the President's Hand Book? 'Show us the
evidence!' said in unison. Evidence which even the blind can see.
What is quite surprising is that it is the President, no less, who has
to initiate the probe. This is a serious indictment on the people who
run the GRA. But then again, hardly surprising, when not so recently
the GPOC attempted to place cameras in the Customs designated area of
the GPOC, designed to root out the established drug network, they met
with the full resistance of the GRA.
So I guess the President will once again supposed-ly have to
personally run down the culprits at the GRA, that all and sundry are
fully aware of. But like the duty free, dolphin and milk scam issues,
when anointed people are involved, events will be caught up in the
myriad of court issues, poor inexperienced prosecutions, union issues,
eventual governmental complacency, supervening events ie Carifesta
(where we will celebrate our glorious mediocrity), dogs biting people,
Ignition Concert, local cricket at the Bourda sward, and inevitably
will die its predictable wasted and natural death. A few people will
be dispatched via their luxury rides to their luxury homes, to live in
peace and harmony with their corrupt nouveau riche neighbours, go to
church on Sundays and prepare for the hereafter, and the big ones will
continue to nest at Customs House, at the usual expense of the
Guyanese overburdened tax payers.
The end result? Millions of hard earned taxpayers monies will be
churned into investigations, meetings, superficial re-workings of the
existing system and high paid consultants who will repeat what has
been said over and over before. The real end result? - Brisk business
as usual at Customs House.
No wonder Naipaul is so caustic on us in the Caribbean.
Yours faithfully,
I Persaud

The Customs racket: No one is protected!

The Customs racket: No one is protected!
Stabroek News, April 18, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1635#more-1635

Last Tuesday President Bharrat Jagdeo made a clinical pronouncement on
graft and corruption. In response to a question raised at his press
conference about the recent Customs/Fidelity alleged fraud he read
what appeared to be nothing short of a 'riot act' that is designed,
it appears, to remove what is widely believed to be one of the oldest
- and, for the businessmen and Customs officials who have benefited
from the practice - most lucrative forms of corruption in Guyana.
And if the President is to be taken at his word the reported
"shakedown" involving Fidelity, a local distribution company and
Customs officials, could trigger a far wider investigation into what,
by the President's own admission, has been a sustained plundering of
the public treasury arising out of collusion between customs
functionaries and importers.

What exactly did the President say? He said, among other things, that
he had learnt during a meeting with the Commissioner General of the
Guyana Revenue Authority of "what seems to be a major ring operating
in the Customs area;" that the ring extends "beyond the Fidelity
issue;" and that " some of the people who have been working in civil
service jobs… have assets that are a hundred times, five hundred times
their accumulated income."
Intriguingly, President Jagdeo alluded to the "far reach" of some of
the people who may be implicated in the Fidelity scam and anticipated
that those people may well engage in "quite a lot of lobbying,"
presumably to have themselves exonerated and perhaps even to seek to
implicate others. "If anyone had any intention of coming to see me or
lobby me," the President declared, "tell them not to. I don't want to
hear any calls about who is innocent and who is guilty;"
And then the President said that he had heard that others, "including
government officials" had been approached. The names of those
officials, the President said, should be given to the investigating
team. And to cap what is potentially a far-reaching pronouncement the
President gave notice that "there is no one who is protected."
There is a profound and multi-faceted significance to the President's
pronouncement. First, it amounts to an open admission of an extensive
and highly organized racket underpinned by dimensions of graft and
"shakedown" involving Customs officials and some businessmen. The
Fidelity scam, the President said, "is not just one matter." In his
words "it's a system" through which "large sums, rather than being
paid into the Treasury, are diverted to a large number of people in
exchange for free passage."
The second significant thing about the President's statement is that
it warns off those who may have been implicated in the scam and who
may seek to use their "far reach" to lobby him – and presumably any
other government or party official who may have the clout to influence
the process; and that, the President said, applies equally to
"government officials" who may be fingered in the scam.
Thirdly, the President said, precisely because of "the far reach of
some of the people" the Fidelity matter and others will not be
subjected to an internal investigation, but rather, is being
investigated by a Task Force involving the Ministry of Finance, the
Auditor General's Office and the Police. In this regard the President
appears to be seeking to circumvent the eventuality of those with "far
reach" attempting to influence - or perhaps go over the head of - an
internal GRA investigation.
What the President's statement has also done is to place a huge
responsibility on the shoulders of the "investigating team." In
declaring that "we will dig deep" he appears to be anticipating
outcomes to the investigation that go beyond the Fidelity matter. One
is hard-pressed to recall any investigating team in a matter involving
corruption ever before having been given such a public carte blanche
by the President.
If the letter and what appears to be the spirit of the President's
pronouncement on the Fidelity matter is enforced by the investigating
team we can anticipate – again according to the President – a careful
examination of "assets", among other things – a pronouncement that
implies that those who have benefited 'big time' from the Fidelity
scam and other scams will be targeted.
The hundred million dollar question, of course, is whether the
investigation will take the course outlined in the sentiments
expressed by the President or whether it will simply evaporate in a
mist of tokenistic disciplinary measures and yet another "shakeup" in
Customs administration that leaves the system open to still more scams
and rackets. The President's statement at last Tuesday's press
conference is, in a very real sense, a challenge to his own
determination – and the determination of the institutions and
individuals charged with investigating the Fidelity scam – to help rid
his administration of the cloud of corruption that hovers over it.

Gov't taking back unused savannah lands

Gov't taking back unused savannah lands
Stabroek News, April 17, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1595

Government is in the process of repossessing unutilized lands in the
intermediate savannahs that were given out to holdings for plantation
type agriculture to make them available to others.
Meanwhile, President Bharrat Jagdeo has said that Trinidad and Tobago
(T&T) had expressed an interest in agricultural pursuits in Guyana
"but unfortunately we have been unable to move beyond expressions of
interests."
At a press conference he held at the Office of the President on
Tuesday, the President said with regard to T&T's interest, "When we
tried to pin down specific projects we have not had much success."
Trinidad has since announced it is setting up its own mega farms on
the twin-island
While speaking about the rising cost of living and ensuring food
security and how this could be dealt with, Jagdeo said that
plantation-type agriculture was important for Guyana.
At present, he said, there are a few proposals which are being
examined. He said that lands given out to large-scale holdings but not
utilized are being recovered to make them available to others with
plans to develop them.
He noted that in June Guyana would be hosting a conference under the
aegis of Caricom to bring regional government officials and investors
in agriculture along with their bankers to see how much business could
be done.
Noting that the government was ensuring that adequate supplies of rice
are available in Guyana, Jagdeo said that the price of rice could not
be kept low when the current rate on the world market is now US$700
per tonne and farmers would want to benefit from the world price.
Basmati rice is also now selling at US$1,200 per tonne on the world
market.
He said that the increase in price was due mainly to drought which is
affecting some countries, increased demand for food in emerging
economies like China and India, the movement away from production of
grains for food to production for ethanol, and the rising cost of oil.

Foreign direct investment and growth

Foreign direct investment and growth
Kaieteur News, Editorial. 16 April 2008.
http://www.kaieteurnewsgy.com/editorial.html

For two decades now we have been following the triple commandments of
the 'Washington Consensus -- stabilize, liberalize, and privatise – in
order to attract foreign direct investments (FDI). The results have
not been exactly stellar.
From our perspective as a developing country, FDI is of significance
only if it creates employment as well as provides capital for
development. However, since transnational corporations prefer to
invest in the modern sectors of the economy, which demand relatively
more skilled personnel than we have at present, our employment needs
go unfulfilled.
As regards capital, FDI makes only marginal contributions in capital
formation. Actually, in the equation of growth and investment, growth
is a crucial determinant of FDI itself; therefore, the question is
whether developing countries commercially grew as a result of the
contribution of FDI, or they grow first in order to attract FDI?
The evidence of FDI, so far attracted by developing countries, shows
that FDI tends to gravitate towards countries that are stable and have
efficient infrastructure – neither of which we are blessed with.
Economic growth, on the other hand, seems to increase with greater
trade openness, instead of foreign direct investment inflows. The
mission lies ahead in making use of investment for our development
needs. So far, the evidence indicates that there are difficulties in
deriving macro-economic benefits from most FDI, as well as to get them
into our area of comparative advantage — agriculture.
Our FDI is highly concentrated in three sectors: telecommunications,
financial services and mining. Our land, labour and capital are not
fully developed for the advanced sector investment. Therefore,
technology transfer as well as employment generation have proven to be
a myth.
In addition, these companies charge high management and services costs
in the name of technological transfer, but actually they use it to
lower their taxes and enhance their profits. In fact, these FDI's have
no commitment for technology transfer to the host country.
The ultimate goal of domestic growth will be achieved only if the
investment is not volatile. The investment in infrastructure,
agriculture and manufacturing sectors will support export-led growth.
That is the reason why neither the countries which developed in the
19th century, like Germany, US or Japan, nor the countries which
developed in the 19th and 20th centuries, like Russia, China and
Korea, placed FDI investment as central to their development strategy,
because benefits and costs are unevenly distributed between the sender
and receiver of these investments.
Though one can point to the success of the East Asian "tigers" as due
to the attraction of foreign investment, what must be appreciated is
that Malaysia, South Korea, China and Japan have made technology
transfer as a performance requirement, along with strong regulations
of the markets.
In addition to maintaining macro-economic stability, all high growth
countries capitalised the foreign investment benefit by having
protectionist measures to attract foreign investment and to spur
export-oriented growth at the same time.
Nevertheless, this does not suggest that we take a regressive trade
policy, but that we should take advantage of the opportunity of
economic globalization. There is also no doubt that economic
globalization is more advantageous for developed countries but, still,
we need to capitalize the opportunities whatever offered to us through
foreign investment by diverting it to the right sectors.
Our Government has rightfully identified our agriculture sector as the
fulcrum of growth in the near term, and has embarked on an ambitious
diversification programme in this area – especially into
non-traditional crops. As we pointed out before, we cannot lose in
this area and we cannot wait on FDI.
We predict, in line with our observation above, that when growth is
demonstrated here, the FDI will arrive. But we will have to ensure
that they follow our development strategy.
In conclusion, it is suggested that, for us in the long run, foreign
capital is no panacea for sustainable development and growth, given
our industrial, institutional and human resource constraints, and will
have no ultimate correlation with economic growth, unless we are able
to capitalize the FDI for competitive advantages and export-led
growth. To believe otherwise will only ensure that we end up simply as
a facilitator for other players.

Forestry commission warns of continuing breaches

Forestry commission warns of continuing breaches
Stabroek News, April 16, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1371#more-1371

The Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC) is concerned that a few forestry
companies continue to be in breach of the GFC guidelines, especially
in relation to widely publicised procedures for harvesting and
extracting forest produce and one such company will be dealt with.
In a release yesterday, Commissioner of Forests James Singh said that
in April 2008, on the basis of GFC monitoring activities, it was
determined that one company has harvested logs from blocks that were
not approved for harvesting by the GFC for the year 2008. "The gravity
of this offence is compounded by the fact that this is a repeat of
breaches committed by the same company in 2007. The GFC will not
tolerate this blatant disregard re compliance with guidelines and
appropriate action will be taken against the company," Singh said.
The GFC also advised that several forestry companies had committed
breaches of procedure in 2007, and after lengthy discussions with the
GFC and the Minister of Agriculture, these companies had agreed in
principle to pay calculated compensations to the GFC. "However on
April 4, 2008, GFC received a lawyer's letter outlining one company's
claims that it was not in breach of GFC procedures. The GFC will take
appropriate actions against this company," Singh said.
He reminded holders of Timber Sales Agreements (TSAs) and Wood Cutting
Leases (WCL) that the final date for submission of 100 per cent
inventory information, regarding 100 hectare blocks to be harvested in
2008 is May 30, 2008.
"Concessionaires are further advised to ensure that their Annual
Operational Plan (AOP) for 2009 is submitted on or before November 30,
2008 with the accompanying 100 per cent inventory information on the
blocks proposed for harvesting in 2009," Singh said.

Dr Misir writes more like a political commentator than an academic

Dr Misir writes more like a political commentator than an academic
Stabroek News, April 16, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=1387#more-1387

Dear Editor,
Poor Prem Misir. The timing is not very good just now. If he knows
anything about cricket he is bound to realise that he is playing off
the back foot.
One always assumed that an academic like Dr Misir would be predisposed
to the objectivity for which his scholarship should have been
characteristic. Instead he prefers to be regarded as another political
commentator. In our besieged environment the implication of bias is
automatic.
Contrary to his uninformed view 'micro-management' is identified as a
counter-productive management style which is condemned internationally
in every respected management publication, for the obvious reason that
it undermines the authority that should complement responsibility,
pollutes and dilutes the decision-making process, and diminishes the
self-confidence of the players involved.
The letter captioned "Dr Misir's submission on marginalization was
simplistic and not impressive" (08.04.09) to which Misir has responded
in Kaieteur News April 11, and the Guyana Chronicle of April 10, would
not have been allowed, at least in the latter newspaper, exactly as a
result of the specific policy instructed by the Administration to the
Chronicle's Board.
This 'exclusion' is certainly synonymous with 'marginalisation' , and
is reflective of the style of micro-management which permeates every
public sector organisation in this country, without exception.
It is truly regrettable that this scholar suffers from the myopia that
afflicts his colleagues and masters. So that rather than deafening
himself to the assertions of 'marginalisation' in our environment, he
should be persuaded to investigate the validity of the range of
situations identified. He could still do a substantive service to the
Administration, if he were to take such an initiative.
Part II therefore of Misir's Perspective on 'marginalisation'
published in the Sunday Chronicle of April 6, 2008, is another useless
exercise in obfuscatory statistics. The ethnic distribution continues
to be meaningless. This is compounded by the author's refusal to
recognise the 'marginalisation' of institutions, regardless of ethnic
distribution. Once again the allegation on Channel 6's (last)
programme on Friday night, April 11, that the Speaker of the National
Assembly was being disciplined is a worrying reference to the
marginalisation process.
Misir would certainly be familiar with the well publicised
micro-management of the UG Council, for example; and the embarrassing
'miniaturisation' (if he insists) of the Vice- Chancellor, amongst
others.
Again Misir should be invited to re-read (he couldn't possibly have
missed it!) S.N's editorial of April 11, 2008, and its explicit
reference to the 'marginalisation' of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
from which a perceptibly 'micro-managed' Foreign Minister has recently
demitted his stressed-out office.
Embarrassingly his successor, less than a week in office, has had her
views publicly challenged by the Head of the Presidential Secretariat
over the matter of Venezuela's aid to Buxton. This obvious confusion
of signals surrounding reporting relationships and accountability may
appear to have just emerged, but as a stressor, it is really
reflective of the continuum of micro-management from 'across the
road'.
Experiences of the Guyana Water Inc. (listed in Misir's table as
Guyana Water Authority), the Forestry Commission, Guyana Gold Board,
Go Invest and the NIS for example, are not necessarily dissimilar.
In one instance an official of a PPP Trade union is the non-executive
Director of a Board, with unchallenged responsibility and authority
for all appointments. Which brings us to this depressing fact: the
'Africans' condescendingly appointed to Public Boards are usually
expected to be 'politically correct'. They are not expected to flex
their intellectual muscle. Even 'politically incorrect' Indians,
however relevantly qualified, are not deemed acceptable. So much for
'ethnic' distribution.
But I began by saying that this was not an auspicious time for the
Misirs of this world. The recent dictat that has resulted in the
closure of Channel 6 for four months must surely be cause for their
blushes; and pause for their reflection on the insidious forms of
'marginalisation'.
Members of the ACB must feel at least discomfited.
Incidentally, this topic was discussed in the press as far back as
2005, when a certain Minister took the same myopic stance as currently
espoused. One Joelle Joaquin writing to SN at the time, had this to
say: "Marginalisation" is about: the demoralization of the spirit; the
consequential diminution of energy and motivation to produce; the loss
of hope – which descends into desperation to quit and migrate – all to
the detriment of self, family and the community as a whole.
Fundamentally it is the loss of self-respect which unhappily informs
the loss of respect for those who caused the condition.
Marginalisation is in fact so endemic a condition in the society that
it is accepted as a natural phenomenon, and hardly perceived as an
aberration."
Yours faithfully,
Carl Abrahams

Omai mining site closure agreement inked -overseas based Guyanese signals interest in location

Omai mining site closure agreement inked -overseas based Guyanese
signals interest in location
By Wendella Davidson
http://www.guyanachronicle.com/topstory.html#Anchor-?xth-44108

Prime Minister Sam Hinds with overall responsibility for the mining
sector and Mr. Ronald Webster, Chairman of the Guyana Geology and
Mines Commission (GGMC), affix their respective signatures to copies
of the joint press release on the 'Closure Plan' for the Omai mines
site, yesterday. Partly hidden is Commissioner, GGMC, Mr. William
Woolford. (Photo by Carl Croker)
A DECLINE in the price of gold on the global market prompted Omai Gold
Mines Limited to close its operations, a top official of the company
said yesterday.
According to Human Resources Manager of the company, Norman Mc Lean of
the 3.8 million ounces of gold which Omai produced, two million
ounces, representing more than half of the amount, was sold at a price
ranging between US$250 and US$300 per ounce.

He said that scenario where the drop in gold prices on the world
market resulted in the company finding it uneconomical to continue,
was the most significant factor which affected OGML which throughout
its operation had as its thrust "mining with the environment in mind."

The closure plan, as agreed to by the relevant parties, includes that
the site will not be restored to its natural state but left as "after
use" meaning infrastructure such as internal roadways, landings,
barge, airport, airstrip and access road, power plant distribution and
mines site facilities, along with the gyratory crusher and the
aggregate plant, will be retained at the location.

Prime Minister Samuel Hinds, who has responsibility for the mining
sector, said the government will shortly be inviting companies and or
groups in the business of mining to re-evaluate and submit proposals
on the underground mining possibilities at the Omai site.

Hinds made this disclosure yesterday, at a news conference hosted at
the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (GGMC) office to formally sign
a joint document and announce the closure plan of the mines site.

It is anticipated that the proposals would be submitted by mid-August,
with a further six weeks for the government and the Geology and Mines
Commission to review the decision made on the way forward.

According to the Prime Minister, already an overseas-based Guyanese
has signalled an interest in the location.

He noted too, that during one of those low periods, the company had
even considered placing the operations under "care and maintenance",
which meant "mothballing and kept it going" in the hope of starting
when the price increases.

Under the termination of the Mineral Agreement and relinquishing of
the Mining Licence agreement, OGML which over the 14 years of
existence invested capital US$253M in the project and produced
approximately 3.8 million ounces of gold from its surface At that time
it is expected that a full and complete Certificate of Compliance will
be issued.

The Omai site was likened by the Prime Minister as a significant event
from which many lessons could be adapted with a view to improving
knowledge in mining, adding that the operations also offered the
opportunity for Guyanese labour to be utilised.

Chairman of GGMC, Mr. Ronald Webster in noting that mining requires a
huge financial investment, thanked OGML, for maintaining access which
was critical to the area, adding too, that the company's presence also
aided the quality of life in the area.

Remarking on the enormous potential for mining in Guyana, the GGMC
Chairman said the importance is not that the Closure Plan no longer
includes a "return to nature", which would have meant that the roads,
the airstrip and other things would have been no longer available, but
that it leaves behind an infrastructure for future development.

On this note Mr. Webster warned that GGMC will take very serious steps
against persons who have been entering the property illegally and
cause damage which can affect the reclamation process.

Commissioner of GGMC, Mr. William Woolford, who in association with
OGML began from the negotiation stage described the experience as a
"quite a unique", "fantastic" and "unforgettable" one, as he has seen
OMGL demonstrate that a mine of that magnitude could be built in a
year and a half with proper organisation.

The site had been explored by Golden Star Resources Limited led by
David Fennell and culminated with Cambior Inc establishing OGML in
1991. The mine, the first large-scale cyanide operation in Guyana was
opened on March 11, 1993 by the late President, Dr Cheddi Jagan.

Guyanese Professor David Dabydeen and Annette Arjune win Sabga awards

Guyanese Professor David Dabydeen and Annette Arjune win Sabga awards
. . . Keep good company for success - Ansa Mc Al Foundation Chairman
Guyana Chronicle, 15 April 2008.
http://www.guyanachronicle.com/topstory.html#Anchor-?xth-44108

Guyanese Annette Arjoon, joint winner of the award for Excellence in
Public and Civic Contributions, accepts her award from Chairman of the
awards Regional Eminent Persons Selection Panel, Sir Ellis Clarke on
Saturday night at the Trinidad Hilton, Port-of-Spain.
NEWSDAY (Trinidad) - Ansa Mc Al Foundation Chairman Dr Anthony Sabga
told recipients of the 2008 Anthony N Sabga Caribbean Awards for
Excellence that the secret to success is to first believe in oneself
and "then act with determination, perseverance and integrity" to
achieve one's goals.
He said this was an attitude he adopted while observing his father in action.

The gala award ceremony was held on Saturday night at the Trinidad
Hilton, Port-of-Spain.

Sabga advised the laureates and those who seek success to keep good
company. "The quality of people with which you associate, mirrors your
own quality," he said, adding, "aside from that, the knowledge and the
inspiration you absorb from your friends and colleagues help to mold
your future."

He explained that his 70 years in business has been rewarding due to
the people he associated with. "I have found pleasure and success with
everything I have done," he said, as he welcomed the laureates into
the ANSA McAL foundation family.

Guyanese Professor David Dabydeen received the Award for Excellence in
Arts and Letters; Barbadian businessman, James Husbands won the Award
for Excellence in Science and Technology and Guyanese Annette Arjoon
and Claudette Richardson-Pious were joint-winners of the Award for
Excellence in Public and Civic Contributions.

The laureates received a gold medal, a citation and TT$500,000.


Chairman of the ANSA McAL Foundation, Dr Anthony Sabga, right,
presents 2008 laureate, David Dabydeen with his Gold Medal for
Excellence in Arts and Letters, as Chairman of the awards Regional
Eminent Persons Selection Panel, Sir Ellis Clarke looks on at the 2008
Anthony N Sabga Caribbean Awards for Excellence held Saturday night at
the Trinidad Hilton, Port-of-Spain. (Newsday photos)
Arjoon and Richardson-Pious gave back to Sabga in a show of
appreciation for their awards.
Arjoon's work as founding Secretary of the Guyana Marine Turtle
Conservation Society (GMTCS) led to the establishment of the
Amerindian operated North West Organics, a company which provides the
natives with a means of income to afford food other than hunting
turtles for their meat and eggs. She has also lobbied Guyana's
government to impose a partial ban on trawler fishing in the areas
around nesting beaches during the nesting season.

GMTCS, has also been instrumental in the Guyanese government decision
to identify Shell Beach, the main Guyanese turtle nesting area, as a
protected area. Addressing Sabga's failed desire to turn Pigeon Point
Beach Resort into a National Park, Arjoon after receiving her award,
dedicated the conservation of Shell Beach to Sabga.

She invited him to come to Guyana to assist in the development of the
beach into a National Park.

Sabga, in an interview with Newsday on Sunday, expressed his delight
at the invitation. "It is not a remote possibility," he said,
"anything to upgrade the concept of one Caribbean identity is foremost
in my mind. What is in Pigeon Point may not be in Guyana but Guyana
has its own unique features."

Sabga went further to hint that the next Caribbean Awards may be held
in another island. "We have to do what we can to keep the Caribbean
united," he said. When accepting her award, Richardson-Pious presented
Sabga with a scaled replica of the award winning "Bashy Bus",
developed by Richardson-Pious through her NGO, Children First.

The bus is a mobile HIV testing and counselling clinic staffed by
youth which goes to inner city and rural locations in Jamaica. Her
organisation assists children who struggle with poverty, abuse,
abandonment, exploitation and malnourishment and extends its services
to their families.

Coordinator of the awards' Regional Eminent Persons Selection Panel,
Michael Mansoor stated that the award is not an "end of life" offering
dedicated to what the individual accomplished.

However, he said it provides an opportunity to encourage the laureates
to foster and nurture their life's work and passion.

Iwokrama operations get FSC stamp of approval

Iwokrama operations get FSC stamp of approval
Kaieteur News, 25 April 2008

The Iwokrama International Centre and its joint venture partner
Tigerwood Guyana Inc (TGI) have achieved Forestry Stewardship Council
(FSC) certification for the Iwokrama rain forest.
The Chief Executive Officers of the two companies, Mr Dane Gobin and
Sir Ronald Sanders respectively, made the announcement yesterday.
They revealed that the FSC certificate has been issued after the
forest management and sustainable harvesting operations in Iwokrama
were closely examined by FSC appointed auditors, Woodmark, of the UK
last year.
FSC's model of certification allows products that flow from certified
forests to enter the global marketplace with a credential that is
unique. Any FSC labelled product can be traced back to a certified
source, and confirms that forestry operations are conducted in
accordance with international social, environmental and economic best
practices. It also confirms that local communities are fully
integrated into the business both at the strategic and operational
levels and are involved in the decision making process.
Mr Gobin said: "This is a proud moment for Iwokrama and its joint
venture partner TGI. In securing the certificate for the Iwokrama
forest and its operations, Guyana has been placed firmly on the map of
responsible forestry management. We are the only venture in the area
of the Guiana Shield to now enjoy FSC accreditation".
He explained that the Guiana Shield underlies Guyana, Suriname, French
Guiana, as well as parts of Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil.
Speaking for TGI, Sir Ronald declared: "FSC certification was
difficult to accomplish. It called for a commitment to sustainable
harvesting that had to be backed with greater resources than a normal
harvesting operation in order to achieve higher standards".
Sanders pointed out that "the sustainable harvesting operation is also
contributing to the maintenance of the valuable ecosystem-services of
the forest which benefits all mankind".
The representatives of the two companies stated that harvesting is
being conducted in strict accordance with principles of Reduced Impact
Logging (RIL). The objective is to minimize damage and maintain the
forest in an intact condition. Felling blocks will be closed to allow
for natural regeneration of plant species according to a 60-year cycle
as soon as selective harvesting is completed.
They also drew attention to the fact that a significant number of
members of the surrounding Amerindian communities have been gainfully
employed in the forest operations and, as these expand adding
value-added activities, even more of the community members will find
jobs within the forest, thus helping to alleviate poverty and
contributing to community cohesiveness.
Mr. Gobin expressed thanks to the WWF Guianas programme and to the
Commonwealth for providing resources to the Iwokrama Centre for the
certification exercise.
The Iwokrama International Centre (IIC) manages the forest under a
mandate from the Government of Guyana and the Commonwealth
Secretariat.
In 1995, the Guyana government formally made a gift of the Iwokrama
forest to the Commonwealth (a group of 53 nations consisting of
Britain and many of its former colonies) with the objective of
demonstrating how tropical forests can be conserved and sustainably
used to provide ecological, social and economic benefits to local,
national and international communities.
Ten years later, the Board of Trustees of IIC decided to pursue a
limited harvesting operation through a business partnership involving
local communities and the private sector. A joint venture company was
formed with TGI investing the risk capital and providing the
management and marketing expertise.
The Iwokrama Centre had been working on forest certification since
2005 when a pre-assessment exercise was conducted to determine
compliance with FSC certification guidelines.
IIC and TGI decided from the outset that they wanted to pursue
international best practice in the sustainable harvesting of timber so
immediately on the formation of the joint venture company a year ago,
both ITI and TGI continued to pursue certification accreditation and
subjected themselves to close scrutiny and rigorous tests from
auditors appointed by FSC.

Trust Fund for Protected Areas System in Guyana to be established - -HPS

Guyana Chronicle news item, Friday 25 April 2008

http://www.guyanachronicle.com/news.html

Trust Fund for Protected Areas System in Guyana to be established
-HPS
HEAD of the Presidential Secretariat (HPS) and Cabinet Secretary, Dr. Roger
Luncheon yesterday announced that progress has been made with the
Administration's undertaking to establish a Protected Area System in Guyana
and to this end, a trust fund will be established in support of the system.
"Subsequent to the recently concluded final round of public consultations
with the communities in the identified areas, reports have been prepared,
submitted to the authorities, and examined," Luncheon told reporters at a
news conference.
"Influenced by those consultations, reports and relevant government
policies, the most preliminary outline of the intended legislation has been
submitted for government's attention," Dr. Luncheon said.
He noted that parallel with the examination of the outline on creating a
protected area system in Guyana, is the focus on the creation and management
of a trust fund to finance the operation.
Dr. Luncheon also contended that Guyana's commitment to establishing the
Protected Area System is supported by domestic and international
stakeholders who have remained focused on one of the main objectives of the
System -- to protect bio-diversity in Guyana.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Mangroved forests of South America

Mangroved forests of South America
Stabroek News, March 25, 2008
http://www.stabroeknews.com/?p=360

VEGETATION AND SPECIES COMPOSITION
Mangrove forests in South America are found on the Atlantic and
Pacific coasts and in the bays and estuaries of eight countries. They
are distributed from the Praia do Sonho in the south (State of Santa
Catarina, Brazil) to the city of Sechura, along the Piura River
(Peru), where only monospecific forests are found (Avicennia
germinans).
A wide range of mangrove tree heights may be found in the different
countries of this region and even within the same country. While their
canopy cover rarely exceeds 20 m in height, tall trees of 45 to 50 m
may be found, for example in the 'Manglares Cayapas-Mataje' Ecologic
Reserve (Ramsar site) or in the states of Amapá, Pará, and Maranhão
(Brazil), where there are specimens of Avicennia spp. with a diameter
of about 1 m and trees of Rhizophora harrisonii reaching 40-45 m. In
these areas, mangroves extend up to 40 km inland and they remain
relatively unthreatened due to the inaccessibility and low human
population density. Well-developed mangrove communities are also found
in the delta of the Amazon River, where trees can reach 40 m in
height, sustained by high rainfall and by the river system itself. Due
to the extremely high inputs of freshwater here, mangroves have to
compete with local freshwater hardwoods, lianas and palms, which
restricts mangrove distribution in the area. The Pacific coast of
Colombia and the Orinoco delta of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
have significant mangrove forests as well, with trees up to 30 m in
height, while 20-25-m mangrove trees have been reported in Guyana.
As is the case in North and Central America, mangrove forest structure
and species composition in South America differ from one coast to the
other. Colombia is the only country with both Caribbean and Pacific
coasts. More than 70 percent of its mangroves are found on the Pacific
coast, where they form well-structured, tall forests.
The lower rainfall and smaller tidal fluctuations of the Caribbean
coast limit forest development, and only small, narrow fringes of
mangroves are found (sometimes in the form of dwarf trees as in the
Guajira department). Notwithstanding these limitations, some
well-developed mangrove forests also grow along this coast, for
example in the Magdalena river estuary.
The mangrove tree species diversity of this region is low - only ten
native species (Table 13) - the lowest worldwide. Three species
(Avicennia germinans, Laguncularia racemosa and Rhizophora mangle) are
very common and are found in all eight countries; others, such as
Avicennia bicolor and Pelliciera rhizophorae, are found with less
frequency or their presence is uncertain.

MANGROVE RESOURCES: STATUS AND TRENDS 1980-2005
Mangroves in South America currently cover slightly less than 2
million hectares, down from some 2.2 million hectares in 1980.
About half the mangrove area of the region is found in Brazil - which
also has the third largest mangrove area in the world (Table 14 and
Figure 3, page 12). More than 90 percent is found in five countries:
Brazil, Colombia, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Ecuador and
Suriname (Figure 13). Guyana, French Guiana and Peru share the
remaining 140 000 hectares. The relatively small mangrove area in
these countries might be explained by the relatively small land area
(Guyana) or by the narrow and in some zones arid or rugged coasts of
Peru and French Guiana, which are not well suited to the development
of mangroves.
During the 1980s and 1990s, mangrove lands were often considered
unproductive and unhealthy. This attitude and the resultant activities
caused a loss of some 250 000 ha of mangroves in the region (11
percent of the 1980 extent) (Figure 14). This loss is low in
comparison with other regions, but can be significant at the national
and local levels, where rural populations often depend on mangroves
for subsistence and for commercial fishing.
In absolute terms, the countries that experienced the highest losses
of mangroves were Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela, all of them with more than 30 000 ha of
mangroves lost since the 1980s. In Colombia the extent of mangroves
has continued to decline over the past 25 years, even though the
annual change rate has decreased from -1.12 percent (1980-1990), to
-0.86 percent (1990-2000) and finally to -0.58 percent in the last
five years. Extensive conversion for shrimp ponds, development of
urban, industrial and tourist infrastructures and reclamation of land
for agricultural crops and pasture led to the loss of 90 000 ha since
the 1980s. Awareness of the importance of this coastal ecosystem is
now slowly increasing and some efforts in reforestation and/or
afforestation have been undertaken (2000) as a joint initiative by the
Ministry of the Environment (Ministerio del Ambiente), the Corporación
Nacional de Investigación y Fomento Forestal (CONIF), ITTO and local
communities.
One success story comes from Ecuador, where the significant losses of
the 1980s and 1990s (some 40 000 ha) are slowly being recovered and
the mangrove area now seems to be stable. The main cause of loss of
mangroves was the unsustainable development of shrimp ponds, which
started in 1966 as a small-scale activity. However, high international
demand converted shrimp into a major trade item, and Ecuador rapidly
became one of the largest producers in South America. The industry
brought significant gains to the country and to local populations,
becoming one of the economic activities with the most growth
nationally and in the region. The outbreak in Ecuador of the
white-spot syndrome virus (WSSV) had a tremendous impact on the
shrimp-farming industry. This impact, together with the activities of
several environmental organizations, the consequent abandoning of the
ponds, the ban on mangrove cutting implemented in 1994 and the
increase in field controls, favoured the natural recolonization of
mangroves in several places. The combination of these factors led to a
slight increase in the extent of mangroves from 2000 to 2005.
Brazil lost at least 50 000 ha of mangroves over the last 25 years,
mainly along the southern coast. The country still possesses
significant and relatively pristine mangrove forests, because most
mangrove areas are located in the less urbanized northern states.
No recent quantitative national data are available (other than the
1991 figures reported in Table 14). However, the relatively low
population pressure on the northern states and government efforts to
protect and rehabilitate damaged forests seem to have contributed to a
major reduction in the loss of mangrove area, which is estimated at
zero in the period 2000-2005. New and updated inventories are needed
to provide more detailed estimates for this country. It is hoped that
a recently approved Global Environment Facility (GEF) project
(Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Biodiversity of the Globally
Important Brazilian Mangrove) will contribute to filling current
information gaps.
Among the most significant causes of past losses and conversions are
the intensive use for timber production, urban development
(southeastern states) and to a lesser extent for fuelwood. Mariculture
(mainly shrimp farming) began in Brazil in the 1970s and it is now
widely practised - primarily along the coast of the northeastern
states (e.g. Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte) - and still represents a
significant threat to mangroves. The impact of this activity is a
national concern, mostly because of the consequent eutrophication of
the waters caused by the high emission of nitrogen and phosphorus and
the widespread illegal cutting of mangroves. In 2003 shrimp farms
covered approximately 13 000 ha, many of these adjacent to mangrove
forests, which has generally resulted in eutrophication of mangrove
creeks and tidal channels.
Intensive use of mangrove forests as a source of fuelwood, development
of urban and tourist infrastructures and conversion of land use to
agriculture appear to be the main causes of mangrove area changes in
the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, where more than 35 000 ha
disappeared in the past 25 years. Some additional losses and
degradation have been caused by oil spills. In this country, as well,
the government is now making efforts to protect these coastal
ecosystems.
In relative terms, the country that experienced the largest loss was
Peru (annual change rate 1980-2005: -2.42 percent), followed by
Ecuador (-1.19 percent), Colombia (-0.91 percent) and the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela (-0.60 percent). Mangroves in Peru have
traditionally been used for the production of fuelwood, charcoal and
poles. However, the main cause of their loss is uncontrolled clearing
for conversion of the land into shrimp ponds. This activity began in
the 1970s and soon became a major source of employment for many
farmers. For example, the industry led to the expansion of the city of
Tumbes, which has nearly doubled its population since the 1960s. The
logging of mangroves is now banned and this, together with the
increasing protection and control of the major mangrove forest in the
country (Santuario Nacional Los Manglares de Tumbes), may have led to
the reduction of the annual rate of loss, which appears to be close to
zero in the last five years (2000-2005).
French Guiana is the only country in the region that did not
experience major changes in mangrove area over the past two decades.
In this country, other forest types are used as the principal source
of timber/fuelwood, and no serious threats seem to pressure the
mangroves. Unfortunately, however, the area estimates for this country
had to be based on qualitative information, because no reliable data
were available since 1980 (Table 14). New inventories are needed in
order to have a clearer picture of the current extent of mangroves.
In Guyana, as well, updated inventories would contribute greatly to a
better estimate of the extent of the mangroves.

MAIN USES AND THREATS
Mangrove forests in South America have traditionally been used for a
wide range of purposes, and the local population still often rely on
them for their livelihood.
The collection of wood forest products is a common practice. Timber
and fuelwood are harvested from mangroves in Brazil, Colombia,
Ecuador, Guyana, Peru and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Production of charcoal from these forests seems to be less widespread,
but it is a traditional practice in Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana and
Peru. Extraction of tannin from the bark of mangrove trees (especially
of Rhizophora mangle) was previously a common activity in Brazil,
Colombia, Ecuador and Guyana, and contributed substantially to
supplying national industries.
Rural communities often rely on mangroves as a source of food and
additional income through the collection of non-wood forest products.
Molluscs, crabs and other crustaceans are collected for local use or
for national consumption. In Ecuador, for example, 2.0-2.5 million
molluscs are collected every month from mangrove forests (Spalding et
al., 1997). In Guyana, Avicennia germinans seeds are used as food.
Mangrove forests also indirectly influence the local economy by aiding
commercial and small-scale fishing activities, which in the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela, for example, have an important role in the
national economy.
Mangrove forests have been converted to other land uses, such as the
production of salt (Ecuador) or reclaimed for agriculture (especially
in Colombia, Ecuador and Guyana) or for urban and tourism development
(e.g. in Colombia and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela). In
addition, as was described in the previous section, the conversion of
mangrove lands for shrimp ponds was a major cause of mangrove
destruction in past years, and even though this activity has been
reduced, it still represents a significant threat.
Awareness of the importance of these coastal ecosystems is growing,
but limited understanding of their services and benefits and lack of
harmonization and implementation of existing laws still represent
threats to mangroves. These forests continue to be under serious
threat also from increasing urban and industrial pollution (e.g.
Peru), the flow of pesticides to coastal zones (e.g. Suriname) and oil
spills (particularly in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela). The
planning and construction of dams or changes in river flows upstream
are also current threats. These decrease the freshwater input,
consequently increasing salinity and reducing nutrients and sediments
transported to the coast.
Mangroves have a significant role in erosion and accretion along the
coastline. An interesting case comes from French Guiana. The entire
coast of this country is affected by the load dispersal system
associated with the mouth of the Amazon River (located some 500 km
east of the country), from which some 1 billion tonnes of sediment are
poured into the ocean every year. It is estimated that 10 percent
reaches the coasts as suspended load (Rudant, 1994). The mangroves
assist in trapping these sediments.

MANGROVE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT
Awareness of the importance of these forests is slowly but steadily
increasing, and mangroves are under some form of protection in most
countries of South America.
However, illegal cutting and use is unfortunately continuing. Legal
protection of mangroves has a long history in Brazil, where the
earliest record dates from 1760.
The King of Portugal, concerned about the loss of potential sources of
tannin, issued an edict to restrict the cutting of mangroves for
fuelwood unless their bark was also used. More recently, the
government has published laws to conserve mangroves and to establish
12 new protected areas. In addition, projects for the conservation and
sustainable use of mangroves in protected areas are being prepared,
which could help reduce pressure on these forests.
Afforestation and reforestation activities have been undertaken (e.g.
in Colombia and Guyana). All South American countries with the
exception of Guyana have at least one Ramsar mangrove site, indicating
added political will to protect these habitats and their environmental
richness. However, more efforts could be undertaken at the national
and regional levels to implement appropriate strategies and
effectively protect these ecosystems. In Ecuador, after extensive
mangrove clearing during the 1970s, the government declared mangroves
protected forests in 1986 and prohibited cutting of mangrove trees in
1994. Forest protection policies and legislation exist in Guyana, as
well, although not dealing directly with mangroves. In Suriname
mangroves are protected together with other swamp forests in
multiple-use management areas, and in Peru, where mangrove clearing is
now prohibited, most mangroves have been protected since 1980 in the
Santuario Nacional Los Manglares de Tumbes, which was declared a
Ramsar site in 1997.

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Guyana and Suriname would gain little from deforestation billions - new study

Guyana Chronicle top story, Wednesday 09 April 2008

http://www.guyanachronicle.com/topstory.html
Guyana and Suriname would gain little from deforestation billions
- new study

OSLO, Norway (Reuters): A slowdown of deforestation from the Amazon to the
Congo basin could generate billions of dollars every year for developing
nations as part of a UN scheme to fight climate change, a study showed on
Monday.
But nations such as Guyana or Suriname, which have maintained high forest
cover, or others like Costa Rica and Chile, which have slowed or reversed
deforestation, would gain little.
Burning of forests by farmers clearing land accounts for 20 percent of world
greenhouse gas emissions. A 190-nation UN climate conference agreed in Bali,
Indonesia, in December to work on ways to reward countries for slowing
deforestation.
"Even with quite conservative assumptions, you can generate substantial
amounts of money and emissions reductions," said Johannes Ebeling of
EcoSecurities in Oxford, England, of a study with Mai Yasue at the
University of British Columbia in Canada.
They said a 10 percent decline in the rate of tropical forest loss could
generate annual carbon finance for developing nations of between 1.5 billion
and 9.1 billion euros ($2.4 to $14.30 billion) assuming carbon prices of
five to 30 euros a tonne.
Such curbs would represent about 300 million tonnes of avoided carbon
dioxide emissions a year -- about the amount of heat-trapping gases, mainly
from burning fossil fuels, emitted by Turkey, or half the total of France.
The United Nations wants reduced emissions from deforestation to be part of
a new long-term climate treaty beyond 2012 to help avert more droughts,
heatwaves, outbreaks of disease and rising seas.
Ebeling told Reuters that any credits for avoided deforestation would have
to be matched by tough restrictions elsewhere, for instance forcing
coal-fired power plants or cement factories to pay for right to emit carbon
dioxide.
The study, published in the British journal Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society B, said there were big challenges in designing a fair
system.
So far, most focus in the UN debate had been on rewarding countries with
high deforestation rates -- such as Brazil and Ecuador -- for slowing the
losses.
There were also problems such as judging the rate of deforestation or
creating controls to ensure that protecting one forest does not lead to
logging or clearance of another.
And some poor countries that could benefit -- such as Liberia or Myanmar --
may simply lack controls needed to regulate land use.
Still, Ebeling said he was optimistic a system could be worked out because
of a widening political willingness to address deforestation as part of a
new treaty to succeed the Kyoto Protocol beyond 2013.

Moths turn Essequibo villages into 'ghost towns' at nights

Guyana Chronicle top story, Saturday 05 April 2008
http://www.guyanachronicle.com/topstory.html
Moths turn Essequibo villages into 'ghost towns' at nights

THOUSANDS of Kabli moths have invaded several villages in northern Essequibo
Coast causing residents to suffer severe itching.
When the Guyana Chronicle visited the villages on Thursday, several
residents of Bounty Hall said the situation is very serious because no
medication seems to stop the itching.
During the nights the villages are like a ghost town with no light as such
residents are calling for urgent help.
According to one resident, Carl Roberts, the very strange moths are
attracted by lights during the night and the dust from the moths which when
in contact with the skin causes terrible itching which results in tiny
bumps.
Mr. Roberts said children are also suffering and are crying when the moths
touch them.
Some of the villages currently under attack are West Bury, Bounty Hall,
Better Success, Andrews, Better Hope and Somerset and Berks.
Reports said the dangerous moths were last night seen as far as Devonshire
Castle, a village some four miles away from West Bury.
The breeding ground for the Kabli moth is the thick bushes on the foreshore
of the Atlantic Ocean between Bounty Hall and Cozier.
According to reports, persons are very afraid to go in the bushes to catch
crabs because of the moth.
Residents are calling on the Ministry of Agriculture to visit the area and
eradicate the dangerous Kabli moths and on the Ministry of Health to
urgently visit and provide medication to combat the itching.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

UN to scale up security, renewable energy projects

Guyana Chronicle top story, Wednesday 02 April 2008

http://www.guyanachronicle.com/topstory.html#Anchor-----------23817

UN to scale up security, renewable energy projects
- First meeting of UN regional heads ends in Georgetown
'It is wrong to continue with a system that gives incentives for
reforestation but doesn't give incentives to maintain forests' - Top UN
official
By Neil Marks
THE United Nations (UN) system is developing a security project here focused
on employment for youth and peace building and is also looking to expand
projects in renewable energy and make sure Guyana's voice is heard in the
global climate change debate.
<http://www.guyanachronicle.com/UN-Photo.jpg>
UN Assistant Secretary General Rebeca Grynspan speaks at a press conference
yesterday at the end of a meeting between regional heads of UN organisations
in the Caribbean and Latin America. Also at the head table, from left are
Director of the Caribbean sub-headquarters of the Economic Commission for
Latin America and the Caribbean Mr. Neil Pierre, Regional Director of United
National Children's Fund Mr. Nils Kastberg, Caribbean representative of the
United Nations Population Fund Mr. Harold Robinson, and head of the UN
system in Georgetown Mr. Aboubacry Tall.

The commitments came following an unprecedented meeting in Georgetown
between a twenty-member high level UN team and the government.
According to UN Assistant Secretary General Rebeca Grynspan, it was the
first time that the regional heads of the various UN programmes for the
Caribbean and Latin America were meeting together. The team comprised
fifteen regional directors and five deputy directors.
Head of the UN system here, Mr. Aboubacry Tall, said the UN's security
project would be complementary to the Citizens Security Programme and the
Security Sector Reform Project in efforts to maintain and preserve "peace
and civility."
He said the project, which is being developed with the government and civil
society, is geared towards three areas: skills training, entrepreneurship
development, employment opportunities for youths -- both at the community
and national level; enhancing the level of dialogue and trust within
communities; and supporting greater responsiveness of national institutions
in a way that makes the citizens feel more included.
Grynspan added that "in the exchange of views with the President, he
highlighted very strongly the importance of youth and youth employment and
youth training as very important centre for social policy and also in the
fight against crime."
In the area of renewable energy, she said that the UN system is committed to
expand on its small projects here.
"We think the UN system can do a lot to mobilize resources towards that goal
(finding renewable energy sources) in Guyana," she said at a press
conference held at the office of the United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP), Brickdam, Georgetown.
She said, in particular, the UN is looking at alternative energy projects
for isolated communities and also to avoid carbon emissions through the use
of fossil fuels.
Guyana is 100 per cent dependent on imported fossil fuels for
transportation. In 2005, the government spent US$220M on fuel imports, with
gasoline imports alone adding up to nine per cent of Gross Domestic Product.
In addition, she said the UN has made a commitment to ensure that Guyana's
voice is heard in the international climate change debate.
She supported Guyana's position that the post-Kyoto environmental compact to
offer support to countries that have preserved their forests.
"It is wrong to continue with a system that gives incentives for
reforestation but doesn't give incentives to maintain forests," Grynspan
declared.
She said the UN has offered to support Guyana's participation in the
international process, "for the voice of Guyana to be heard and to liaise
with the rest of the countries that take this view."
President Jagdeo has pledged to preserve the nation's pristine rainforest -
the size of England - if he gets partners willing to pay in the interest of
fighting further changes in the world's climate.
"We stand ready to work with any bilateral or commercial partner who shares
our vision of sustainable development where our long established and world
leading commitment to sustaining our forest can be matched by economic
rewards which support our national development efforts...," Mr. Jagdeo said
last October at a meeting of Commonwealth finance ministers

'We will all live to regret it' Professor Girvan warns that EPA could widen inequalities among CARICOM States

Guyana Chronicle news item, Monday 31 March 2008

http://www.guyanachronicle.com/news.html

'We will all live to regret it'
. . . Professor Girvan warns that EPA could widen inequalities among CARICOM
States
<http://www.guyanachronicle.com/Professor-Girvin.jpg>
Professor Norman Girvan

JAMAICA OBSERVER - Leading Caribbean scholar of the political economy,
Professor Norman Girvan, has said the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)
between the CARIFORUM group and the European Commission could create wide
inequalities among CARICOM member states and fragment the Community.
Addressing the closing session of the ninth annual Sir Arthur Lewis
Institute of Social and Economic Studies (SALISES) conference at the
University of the West Indies, Mona, Friday evening, Girvan called the EPA
"an agreement we will all live to regret at a time not too far into the
future".
The EPA, which was brokered last December, gives Caribbean countries duty
and quota free access in goods (with the temporary exception of rice and
sugar) and services to EU, and is supposed to be the replacement for
preferential trade agreements.
Girvan's warning came as Antony Hylton, Jamaica's former minister of Foreign
Affairs and Foreign Trade, argued in an essay published on Page 13 of the
Sunday Observer that the Jamaican Opposition and Government should work
together on getting an amendment to the EPA, particularly the Most Favoured
Nation (MFN) Clause.
"Our concern about the scope of the agreement to cover areas not yet settled
in the CARICOM arrangements, for example, government procurement, are for
very much the same reason, that is, lack of resources to adequately meet the
challenges inherent in these far-reaching obligations," said Hylton.
"However, our greatest concern then and now is the severe limitation on
policy option by future governments implied by the 11th-hour acceptance of
the MFN Clause, proposed by Europe, and recommended for acceptance by Prime
Minister Golding to the rest of CARIFORUM governments in the dying moments
of the negotiations. The MFN Clause obliges Jamaica and its CARIFORUM
partners to give to Europe any more favourable treatment/benefit it gives to
a third party with which it enters into a subsequent agreement," added
Hylton.
Girvan, who was being honoured at the conference, said there was room for
possible conflict between the provisions of the EPA and those of the treaty
that formed CARICOM.
"The jury is still out on what happens if there is a conflict between the
provisions of governance for the EPA -- which entrenches a joint council of
the European Commission and the CARIFORUM states, and gives that council the
power to make legally binding decisions on the parties, who are obliged to
carry them out on pain of being submitted to the disputes settlement
provisions.
"And the jury is still out on what would happen if there is a conflict
between the organs of governance and the provisions of the Treaty of
Chagaramus and the EPA," Girvan said.
He said, too, that the wording of the EPA does not make clear when CARIFORUM
states can or should act individually or collectively.
"It states that the parties to this agreement are the European Commission
representing EU member states on the one hand, and CARIFORUM states acting
collectively on the other hand, but it also goes on to say, 'for the purpose
of this agreement the CARIFORUM states act collectively', but that where the
provisions of the agreement require the individual CARIFORUM states to
exercise their rights or to undertake obligations, the reference in the
document is to signatory CARIFORUM states," Girvan said.
He said the Caribbean had come to a metaphorical fork in the road. One path
(the CSME) led to greater regional integration "with the purpose of
exercising greater autonomy", and the other path (the EPA) led to "loss of
autonomy to shape our own future".
Girvan said greater regionalism should have existed before any sort of
agreement with the Europeans. Whether the Caribbean would actually ever be
in a position to change its fortunes, Girvan said, was left to regional
governments and time. He said part of the solution also lay in a
"reassertion of the intellectual space" and more critical, individual
thought, particularly among the young.
"In the words of [Marcus] Garvey, 'I want our people to think for
themselves'," Girvan said. In the words of [Lloyd] Best, 'We are at the
centre of our world'.
"In those of [George] Beckford, 'We have the resources in this region and we
have the ingenuity among our people to make of this region a veritable
paradise on this earth.'"